The Prophet (peace be upon him and his family): It is narrated from Amir al-Mu'minin Ali ibn Abi Talib (peace be upon him) that one day the adherents of five religions and creeds — the Jews, the Christians, the naturalists (Dahriyya), the Manicheans (Thanawiyya), and the polytheists of the Arabs — gathered before the Noble Prophet. The Jews said: "We believe that Uzair is the son of Allah. We have come to debate with you on this matter. If you follow us in this belief, we are ahead of you because of our precedence in time, and if you oppose us, we will engage in debate with you." The Christians claimed that Isa the Messiah (peace be upon him) is the son of Allah and is united with Him, and said: "We have come to see what you believe about this. If you accept, you will follow us, and if you oppose, we will debate with you." The naturalists said: "Things have been eternal and shall remain forever. No one brought them into being. We have come to debate with you. If you accept our belief, our precedence gives us merit, and if you oppose, we shall debate." The Thanawiyya (followers of Mani) said: "Light and darkness govern the world. If you accept this you follow us, and if you oppose, we shall debate." The Arab polytheists said: "We take the idols to be our gods. We have come to debate with you. If you follow us, we are ahead, and if you oppose, we shall engage in debate." The Noble Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) said: "I believe in the One Allah, who has no partner, and I disbelieve in the idols and every object of worship other than Him. Allah has sent me to give glad tidings and warning to all the worlds and has made me a proof for all. I shall shortly refute the belief of each of you and hang your baseless beliefs around your necks." At this point he turned to the Jews and said: "Do you want me to accept your belief without proof?" They said: "No." He said: "Then on what basis do you regard Uzair as the son of Allah?" They said: "Because he revived the Torah for the Children of Israel after it had grown old. He could only do this because he is the son of Allah." The Noble Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) said: "How is it that Uzair became the son of Allah, while Musa, who brought the Torah with all the miracles he had, did not become the son of Allah? If Uzair is the son of Allah because of reviving the Torah, then Musa is more worthy of this station. And if Allah's honouring Uzair through this act makes him a son, then the position and rank of Musa, which is higher than his, must produce for him a rank higher than sonship. If you mean by sonship what you observe in your own children — that through the intercourse of father and mother a child is born from the mother through birth — this belief is disbelief; you have likened Allah to a creature and ascribed to Him the attributes of created beings. In that case He too must be created and must have a Creator and Maker." They said: "This is not what we mean, for such a belief is disbelief, as you have pointed out. Rather, we believe he is the son of Allah in the sense that he possesses such rank and standing, even though there is no birth involved — just as our scholars, when they wish to distinguish someone above another and honour him, say: 'He is my son,' without any birth being involved and without them having any kinship. Allah, on account of Uzair's rank, took him as His son, not that he was born of Him." The Noble Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) said: "In that case, as I explained before, Musa (peace be upon him) is more worthy of this station than he is. This admission is even more damning and defeating for you. Furthermore, your argument requires you to accept for him a station even higher than sonship, because you said that your elders address a stranger who has no kinship with them, out of respect, as 'my son.' They likewise say to another stranger: 'This is my brother,' or 'my elder and father,' or 'my master and lord.' All these appellations are on account of honour and greatness, and the more they wish to honour someone, the higher a station they give him. In that case Musa (peace be upon him) must be Allah's brother, or His elder, or His father and lord, because they honour him more than Uzair (peace be upon him) and confer this rank on him, saying: 'My lord and my master, dear uncle, or my commander.' Do you then allow that Musa (peace be upon him) be Allah's brother, or elder, or uncle and chief, or master and lord and commander?" The Jews were unable to reply and said: "Give us time to think about this and prepare an answer." He said: "You have time, provided that you do not abandon fairness, so that Allah may guide you." Then he turned to the Christians and said: "You believe that the Eternal (mighty and majestic) has united with Isa the Messiah (peace be upon him), so that he has become His son. What do you mean by this belief? Do you say that the eternal and pre-existent Essence of Allah has become created through union with Isa, who himself is a creature? Or do you say that Isa, who is himself a created being with a prior non-existence, has become eternal and pre-existent through his connection with Allah? Or do you mean by this union that Allah has given him a distinction and rank that He has given to no one else? If you say that the eternal Allah has become created, that is a false claim, for it is impossible for the eternal and pre-existent Essence to change and become created. If you say that Isa has become eternal and pre-existent, this too is impossible, for it is impossible for a creature to become eternal and pre-existent. If you say your meaning of union is that He has granted him a distinction and singled him out from among people, then you yourselves have admitted that Isa (peace be upon him) is created and that this rank and standing was not there before but came into being afterwards — for when Isa (peace be upon him) is created and the rank given to him also came into being afterwards, both are originated and created, and this contradicts what you first claimed." The Christians said: "When Allah made those miracles appear at the hand of Isa (peace be upon him), He called him His son on account of his rank and standing." The Noble Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) said: "Did you hear what I said in reply to the Jews?" Then he repeated the same statement. All were silent except one man who said: "Do you not believe that Ibrahim is the Khalil of Allah?" He said: "Yes." He said: "Then what is wrong if we say that Isa (peace be upon him) is the son of Allah?" The Noble Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) said: "These two are not alike. For when we say Ibrahim is Khalilullah, either the word khalil is derived from khulla, meaning need and poverty, in which case we say he is needy and poor at the door of Allah and independent of others. This meaning is clear, for at the moment when they wanted to cast him into the fire and placed him in the catapult, Allah commanded Jibra'il (peace be upon him): 'Reach My servant Ibrahim.' He met Ibrahim (peace be upon him) in the middle of the sky and said: 'Give whatever command you have, for I have been sent to help you.' In reply to Jibra'il he said: حَسْبِیَ اللهُ وَ نِعْمَ الْوَکِیلُ [Allah suffices me and He is the best guardian]; I do not seek refuge in another and present my needs only to Him. So Allah named him His khalil, because he is independent of others and needy and poor at His door. If we take khalil from khulla in the sense that he is aware of matters and secrets that others are not aware of, this rank does not entail likening Allah to creation. As you can see, in either of these two meanings, when Ibrahim is not in need of Him he is not His khalil, and when he is not aware of His secrets, again he is not His khalil. But one who is another's child, born of him — even if he insults him and pushes him away — is still his child, because the reality of sonship is established. Moreover, if you compare being khalil with being a son and say that Isa (peace be upon him) is Allah's son, then you must also grant this rank to Musa (peace be upon him), for the miracles of Musa (peace be upon him) were no less than those of Isa (peace be upon him). Given this meaning, one could also say that they are Allah's chief, uncle, ruler and commander, just as I said to the Jews." At this moment one of the Christians said to another: "In the heavenly books it is said that Isa (peace be upon him) said: 'I go to my father.'" He said: "If you believe in that book, it also says there: 'I go to your father and my own.' So by the same reasoning that Isa (peace be upon him) is the son of Allah, all those whom Isa (peace be upon him) was addressing in this speech would also have to be sons of Allah. Furthermore, if your proof is what is written in that book, then your earlier argument — that Allah gave this position to him because of his distinction and rank — is invalidated. For you said that this sonship was on account of the honour and standing of Isa (peace be upon him), and you yourselves know that the standing of Isa (peace be upon him) was not possessed by those to whom Isa (peace be upon him) said: 'I go to my father and yours.' So sonship is not exclusive to Isa (peace be upon him), and moreover you interpreted the words of Isa contrary to his intent. Perhaps he meant: I go to Adam, who is my father and yours, or to Nuh the prophet (peace be upon him), and Isa (peace be upon him) meant nothing other than this." The Christians fell silent and said: "Until now we have never encountered such argument and debate. Allow us to think more about this."